The problem is especially acute in instances where it is unlikely that Congress anticipated and legislated for the specific circumstances being disputed before the court. The two main theories of statutory interpretation-purposivism and textualism-disagree about how judges can best adhere to this ideal of legislative supremacy. ![]() When courts render decisions on the meaning of statutes, the prevailing view is that a judge’s task is not to make the law, but rather to interpret the law made by Congress. federal government, it is the job of courts to say what the law is, as Chief Justice John Marshall announced in 1803.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |